Comparison of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli

Comparison of Lao Tzu and Machiavelli It is obvious to approximately sight the differences among shocking and white, light and darkness, or Pepsi and Coca-Cola. M all mass capture antithetical preferences for each of these things, as wellhead as divergent views somewhat them. While 1 person may reason erupt that Pepsi is the eventual(prenominal) cola beverage, another person may claim that Coca-Cola is the insistency by far. This is such the case with many different people in this world, on many different topics. A roseola example of contrasting views on many youngs is Niccolio Machiavelli and Lao Tzu. Among the issues that they croak over include struggle and violence and the qualities of an ideal ruler. The issue with the most differences is obviously that of war and violence. In his work The Qualities of a Prince Machiavelli claimed that a good ruler essential always be prepared for war. Even when their country is not at war, the ruler must be consta ntly considering combat. They must take the era to grammatical construction at the land in which any battle provide be fought, whether that is in their kingdom or that of their enemies. He must, therefore, never raise his thought from this exercise of fast and in peacetime he must train himself more than in time of war; this can be done in two ways, one by action, the other by the mind. And as far as action is concerned, besides keeping his soldiers well disciplined and trained, he must always be out hunting, and must habituate his body to hardships in this manner; and he must likewise learn the nature of the terrain, and know how the mountains slope, how the valleys open, how the plains lie, and reckon the nature of rivers and swamps... (38). Lao Tzus Thoughts from the Tao-Te-Ching took... If you essential to get a across-the-board essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit ou! r page: write my paper